The basis, together.
Read the instruction and the relevant supporting material without losing the question between them.


DecideSee what changed, what came back,
and what remains open.
Part of the Veto workflow we’re shaping with design partners. Shape it with us →
When it is time to decide, the relevant material should already be together. The instruction. The reply. The question that still needs you.
Veto brings the basis into view.
Your office decides what comes next.
Review the file, see what remains open, and keep your office’s judgment with the work.

A reply can complete a request without completing a review. Keep the open question visible until the right person has considered it.
See how a request comes backRead the instruction and the relevant supporting material without losing the question between them.
A missing document, a changed detail, or an unanswered question has a place in the review—not just in someone’s memory.
Record the office’s assessment and who takes the next step. Veto does not make the decision or execute the payment.
Leave the next person the material considered, the office’s assessment, and anything still open.
Next: the Review Record
Veto brings the relevant material and open questions into view. Your office makes its assessment under its own procedure. Its bank executes any payment.
No. A check has a particular source, scope, and question. Completing it is not a blanket guarantee that an instruction is genuine, and a record is not a payment authorization.
The earlier review belongs with the version it considered. The changed instruction needs its own consideration. The example above shows that distinction; it is not a live escrow file.
Confirm the supported checks, their sources, and their limits with Veto before live use. Talk to us about your office.
A conversation about your office and the work you do.