Start with the material.
Prepared facts stay connected to their original source, including what a summary may have left out.
Review
There’s knowing.
Then there’s
knowing why.
See the detail and the source behind it.
Inside Veto ReviewPart of the Veto workflow we’re shaping with design partners. Shape it with us →
It should help you see.
Not ask you to believe.
Prepared details belong beside the material behind them. Including the detail that still needs another look.
A second look.
Not a second search.
Open the source and keep the proposed change in view. Review the supporting material before deciding what belongs in the file.
Useful, right where
you need it.
Make the difference visible.
See the changed detail and the open question together. A comparison gives you a place to begin.
Keep the decision yours.
Question the preparation, correct a reading, or ask for more. The office records its own determination.
Good questions.
Can the AI be wrong?
Yes. The point of showing the source is to make inspection and correction practical. A plausible summary is not independent evidence.
What happens when something is missing?
Keep the question open and ask for the contribution it needs. Missing or conflicting material should remain visible in the review.
What do these screens show?
These are captures of the Veto interface using a sample file. They show the working layout and review controls; no customer information appears here.